GeForce GT 625 OEM vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS with GeForce GT 625 OEM, including specs and performance data.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS outperforms GT 625 OEM by a whopping 853% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 472 | 1124 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 19.06 | 2.76 |
| Architecture | no data | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | no data | GF119 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 26 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 18 February 2013 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 874 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 292 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 6.992 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.1678 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 4 |
| TMUs | no data | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR5x | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8448 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 13.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 2.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 35
+1067%
| 3−4
−1067%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+1000%
|
5−6
−1000%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
| God of War | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+1025%
|
4−5
−1025%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+1000%
|
5−6
−1000%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 31
+933%
|
3−4
−933%
|
| Fortnite | 60−65
+917%
|
6−7
−917%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1000%
|
4−5
−1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35
+933%
|
3−4
−933%
|
| God of War | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+1133%
|
3−4
−1133%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+860%
|
10−11
−860%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+1025%
|
4−5
−1025%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+1000%
|
5−6
−1000%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 150−160
+986%
|
14−16
−986%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30
+900%
|
3−4
−900%
|
| Fortnite | 60−65
+917%
|
6−7
−917%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1000%
|
4−5
−1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35
+933%
|
3−4
−933%
|
| God of War | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 36
+1100%
|
3−4
−1100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+1133%
|
3−4
−1133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 41
+925%
|
4−5
−925%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+860%
|
10−11
−860%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+1025%
|
4−5
−1025%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27
+1250%
|
2−3
−1250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1000%
|
4−5
−1000%
|
| God of War | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+1133%
|
3−4
−1133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 22
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+860%
|
10−11
−860%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 60−65
+917%
|
6−7
−917%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 75−80
+875%
|
8−9
−875%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+1400%
|
1−2
−1400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+940%
|
5−6
−940%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+1020%
|
10−11
−1020%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+1200%
|
2−3
−1200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+1100%
|
2−3
−1100%
|
| God of War | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+980%
|
5−6
−980%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| God of War | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and GT 625 OEM compete in popular games:
- Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 1067% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.01 | 1.05 |
| Recency | 26 October 2023 | 18 February 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 29 Watt |
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has a 853.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.
GT 625 OEM, on the other hand, has 37.9% lower power consumption.
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 625 OEM in performance tests.
Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 625 OEM is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
