ATI Radeon HD 3830 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking461not rated
Place by popularity77not in top-100
Power efficiency28.20no data
Architectureno dataTeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameno dataRV670
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2023 (2 years ago)1 April 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536320
Core clock speedno data668 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data666 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data10.69
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4275 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz828 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data26.5 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2023 1 April 2008
Chip lithography 4 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 75 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1275% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and Radeon HD 3830. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 3830 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 3830
Radeon HD 3830

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 12 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or Radeon HD 3830, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.