GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking460not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.19no data
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2023 (2 years ago)1 February 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
Core clock speedno data1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data69.22
Floating-point processing powerno data2.215 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data84.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2023 1 February 2019
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 75 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.