GeForce 6600 GT vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS with GeForce 6600 GT, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
30 Watt
9.92
+2818%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms 6600 GT by a whopping 2818% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4361283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.37no data
Architectureno dataCurie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameno dataNV43 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data12 August 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64.95

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data146 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data4.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
1440p180−1

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data64.95

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Counter-Strike 2 19 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 27−30 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 0−1
Valorant 40−45
+4000%
1−2
−4000%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Counter-Strike 2 16 0−1
Dota 2 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+4100%
1−2
−4100%
Fortnite 60−65
+3000%
2−3
−3000%
Forza Horizon 4 42
+4100%
1−2
−4100%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Metro Exodus 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+3950%
2−3
−3950%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Valorant 40−45
+4000%
1−2
−4000%
World of Tanks 150−160
+2920%
5−6
−2920%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Counter-Strike 2 14 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45
+4100%
1−2
−4100%
Forza Horizon 4 36
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+3950%
2−3
−3950%
Valorant 40−45
+4000%
1−2
−4000%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 15 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 15 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1
World of Tanks 75−80
+3700%
2−3
−3700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 28 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1
Valorant 24−27 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Fortnite 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 0−1
Valorant 10−12 0−1

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and 6600 GT compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 3400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.92 0.34
Chip lithography 4 nm 110 nm

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 2817.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 2650% more advanced lithography process.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook card while GeForce 6600 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
GeForce 6600 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 232 votes

Rate GeForce 6600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.