Radeon R9 390 X2 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking633not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.44no data
Architectureno dataGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameno dataGrenada
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2024 (1 year ago)3 September 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560 ×2
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt580 Watt
Texture fill rateno data160.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.12 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data64 ×2
TMUsno data160 ×2
L1 Cacheno data640 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data4x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data345.6 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2024 3 September 2015
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 580 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 9 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 2800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and Radeon R9 390 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 390 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or Radeon R9 390 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.