Radeon HD 7750 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS with Radeon HD 7750, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
2024
20 Watt
6.24
+53.7%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS outperforms HD 7750 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking602709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.11
Power efficiency23.785.63
Architectureno dataGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameno dataCape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date3 September 2024 (less than a year ago)15 February 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768512
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data25.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX® 11
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 6.24
+53.7%
HD 7750 4.06

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 3717
+65.9%
HD 7750 2240

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Sons of the Forest 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 21
+75%
12−14
−75%
Fortnite 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Sons of the Forest 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Valorant 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+60%
65−70
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Fortnite 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Sons of the Forest 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Valorant 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 18
+80%
10−11
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Sons of the Forest 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Valorant 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Valorant 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Sons of the Forest 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Valorant 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and HD 7750 compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is 67% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.24 4.06
Recency 3 September 2024 15 February 2012
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has a 53.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 587 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or Radeon HD 7750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.