GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking623not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.29no data
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameno dataGA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2024 (1 year ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685888
Core clock speedno data510 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1035 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data190.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12.19 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cacheno data5.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2024 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 4 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 80 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 16 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.