Radeon RX 6800 3456SP vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking917not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.58no data
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2018 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)no data$579

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3456
Core clock speedno data1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data486.0
Floating-point processing powerno data15.55 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 250 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has 3471.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Radeon RX 6800 3456SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6800 3456SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685
AMD Radeon RX 6800 3456SP
Radeon RX 6800 3456SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 17 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 6800 3456SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Radeon RX 6800 3456SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.