CMP 170HX vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking915not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.60no data
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameno dataGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2018 (7 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4480
Core clock speedno data1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data394.8
Floating-point processing powerno data12.63 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cacheno data13.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1458 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,493 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 1 September 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 250 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has 3471.4% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 685 and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook graphics card while CMP 170HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685
NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 17 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 685 or CMP 170HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.