Radeon 740M vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Qualcomm Adreno 680
2018
2.74

Radeon 740M outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by a whopping 230% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking764447
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRDNA 3
GPU code nameno dataPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (5 years ago)23 May 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt30 Watt (30 - 15 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data40.00

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon 740M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.74
Radeon 740M 9.03
+230%

Radeon 740M outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by 230% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 709
Radeon 740M 3496
+393%

Radeon 740M outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by 393% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%
Hitman 3 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%
Hitman 3 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Hitman 3 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 740M is 1500% faster than the Qualcomm Adreno 680.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Radeon 740M surpassed Qualcomm Adreno 680 in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.74 9.03
Recency 6 December 2018 23 May 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 30 Watt

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 680 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 28 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.