T600 vs Quadro4 980 XGL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro4 100 NVS Quadro4 100 NVS PCI Quadro4 200 NVS Quadro4 380 XGL Quadro4 400 NVS PCI Quadro4 500 XGL Quadro4 550 XGL Quadro4 580 XGL Quadro4 700 XGL Quadro4 750 XGL Quadro4 900 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 30HX CMP 40HX CMP 50HX RTX 4000 RTX 5000 RTX 6000 RTX 8000 T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 Tesla T4

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro4 980 XGL and T600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro4 980 XGL
2002
128 MB DDR
0.01

T600 outperforms Quadro4 980 XGL by a whopping 152200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
T600 T600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1577383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.32
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV28 A2TU117
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 November 2002 (23 years ago)6 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed300 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistors36 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40053.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs840
L1 Cacheno data640 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed325 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro4 980 XGL 0.01
T600 15.23
+152200%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro4 980 XGL 5
Samples: 2
T600 6365
+127200%
Samples: 580

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−154
1440p-0−123
4K-0−120

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 46
+0%
46
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+0%
59
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+0%
27
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27
+0%
27
+0%
Metro Exodus 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 8
+0%
8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.01 15.23
Recency 12 November 2002 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

T600 has a 152200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro4 980 XGL in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
FireStream 9350 FireStream 9350
T600 T600
vs
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
Tesla K10 Tesla K10
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
530X Mobile Radeon 530X Mobile
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
ATI HD 4290 IGP HD 4290 IGP
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
RX 590 GME RX 590 GME
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
GT 1010 GT 1010
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GA103 RTX 3060 Ti GA103
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
L40 CNX L40 CNX
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
L40G L40G
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
RTX 3060 GDDR6X RTX 3060 GDDR6X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 102 votes

Rate Quadro4 980 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 707 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 980 XGL or T600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.