Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Quadro4 980 XGL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro4 100 NVS Quadro4 200 NVS Quadro4 380 XGL Quadro4 400 NVS PCI Quadro4 500 XGL Quadro4 550 XGL Quadro4 700 XGL Quadro4 750 XGL Quadro4 900 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7-Core iGPU 7-Cores iGPU 8-Core iGPU Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro4 980 XGL with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

Quadro4 980 XGL
2002
128 MB DDR
0.01

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms Quadro4 980 XGL by a whopping 95000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1547483
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNV28 A2Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 November 2002 (22 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors36 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate2.400no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed325 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112_2
OpenGL1.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dead Island 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dead Island 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dead Island 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.01 9.51
Recency 12 November 2002 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 95000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 21 years, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro4 980 XGL in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro4 980 XGL is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL
Quadro4 980 XGL
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
Instinct MI325X Radeon Instinct MI325X
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
Quadro4 980 XGL Quadro4 980 XGL
vs
FX 1000 Quadro FX 1000
RTX 5080 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
vs
NVS 440 NVS 440
A100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
vs
Tesla S1070 Tesla S1070
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
vs
FX 550 FX 550
9300 GS NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS
vs
FX 5500 FX 5500
Radeon 780M AMD Radeon 780M
vs
FX 1400 FX 1400
HD 6950M AMD Radeon HD 6950M
vs
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
HD 6970M Mac Edition AMD Radeon HD 6970M Mac Edition
vs
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
GTX 1080 Max-Q GTX 1080 Max-Q
Apple M4 8-core GPU Apple M4 8 core GPU
vs
GTX 1070 Max-Q GTX 1070 Max-Q
RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
vs
Pro 560 Pro 560

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 102 votes

Rate Quadro4 980 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 14 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 980 XGL or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.