RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Quadro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 600 Quadro 2000 Quadro 4000 Quadro K620 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2200 Quadro M4000 Quadro P2000 Quadro P4000 Quadro Plex 7000 Quadro RTX 5000 Quadro T1000
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro and RTX 6000 Ada Generation, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro
1999
32 MB SDR
2.45

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms by a whopping 2862% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro Quadro
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.82
Power efficiencyno data16.74
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV10AD102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1999 (25 years ago)3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data18176
Core clock speed135 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors17 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology220 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate0.541,423
Floating-point processing powerno data91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs4192
TMUs4568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2.45
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 72.57
+2862%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 947
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 27995
+2856%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−3000%
186
+3000%
1440p5−6
−3120%
161
+3120%
4K3−4
−3800%
117
+3800%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data36.55
1440pno data42.23
4Kno data58.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 260
+0%
260
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hitman 3 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219
+0%
219
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+0%
184
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

This is how Quadro and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 3000% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 3120% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 3800% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.45 72.57
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 220 nm 5 nm

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has a 2862% higher aggregate performance score, a 153500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4300% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro
Quadro
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro Quadro
vs
RTX 8200 Quadro RTX 8200
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
FX 1700 Quadro FX 1700
vs
7300 GT GeForce 7300 GT
FX 1700 Quadro FX 1700
vs
ATI HD 4650 Radeon HD 4650
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
NVS 450 Quadro NVS 450
FX 580 Quadro FX 580
vs
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
FX 580 Quadro FX 580
vs
GeForce G210M GeForce G210M
K2200M Quadro K2200M
vs
T600 T600
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
UHD Graphics 48EU Mobile UHD Graphics 48EU Mobile
GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
vs
RTX 4060 AD106 GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 3100
vs
HD Graphics 5300 HD Graphics 5300

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 77 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.