FirePro M4170 vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T2000 Mobile and FirePro M4170, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
19.09
+584%

T2000 Mobile outperforms M4170 by a whopping 584% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking319842
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.45no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Opal
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)23 April 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024384
Core clock speed1575 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Wattno data
Texture fill rate114.221.60
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6424
L1 Cache1 MB96 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.56.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T2000 Mobile 19.09
+584%
FirePro M4170 2.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T2000 Mobile 7985
+584%
FirePro M4170 1167
Samples: 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+588%
16−18
−588%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+720%
5−6
−720%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
+710%
10−11
−710%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+588%
16−18
−588%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+720%
5−6
−720%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+600%
9−10
−600%
Fortnite 100−110
+629%
14−16
−629%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+690%
10−11
−690%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+640%
10−11
−640%
Valorant 140−150
+590%
21−24
−590%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
+710%
10−11
−710%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+588%
16−18
−588%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+677%
30−33
−677%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+720%
5−6
−720%
Dota 2 110−120
+588%
16−18
−588%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+600%
9−10
−600%
Fortnite 100−110
+629%
14−16
−629%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+690%
10−11
−690%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+620%
10−11
−620%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+640%
10−11
−640%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%
Valorant 140−150
+590%
21−24
−590%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+710%
10−11
−710%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+720%
5−6
−720%
Dota 2 110−120
+588%
16−18
−588%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+600%
9−10
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+690%
10−11
−690%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+640%
10−11
−640%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%
Valorant 140−150
+590%
21−24
−590%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+629%
14−16
−629%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+683%
18−20
−683%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+613%
24−27
−613%
Valorant 180−190
+654%
24−27
−654%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+620%
5−6
−620%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Valorant 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Dota 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.09 2.79
Recency 27 May 2019 23 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

T2000 Mobile has a 584.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M4170 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD FirePro M4170
FirePro M4170

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 483 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate FirePro M4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T2000 Mobile or FirePro M4170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.