Radeon 8040S vs Quadro T1200 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with Radeon 8040S, including specs and performance data.
8040S outperforms T1200 Mobile by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 350 | 254 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 74.22 | 34.92 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) |
| GPU code name | TU117 | Strix Halo |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 April 2021 (5 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1295 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,700 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 | 179.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.918 TFLOPS | 5.734 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 8 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 64 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 58
−37.9%
| 80−85
+37.9%
|
| 1440p | 33
−36.4%
| 45−50
+36.4%
|
| 4K | 81
−35.8%
| 110−120
+35.8%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
−33.8%
|
95−100
+33.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65
−27.7%
|
80−85
+27.7%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
−29.5%
|
120−130
+29.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−38.9%
|
100−105
+38.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−45.5%
|
80−85
+45.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
−49.3%
|
100−105
+49.3%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
−25.5%
|
170−180
+25.5%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
−33.8%
|
95−100
+33.8%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
−19%
|
260−270
+19%
|
| Dota 2 | 114
−40.4%
|
160−170
+40.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 59
−40.7%
|
80−85
+40.7%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
−29.5%
|
120−130
+29.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−38.9%
|
100−105
+38.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−45.5%
|
80−85
+45.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 71
−29.6%
|
90−95
+29.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
−50%
|
55−60
+50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
−49.3%
|
100−105
+49.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 71
−8.5%
|
75−80
+8.5%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
−25.5%
|
170−180
+25.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
−33.8%
|
95−100
+33.8%
|
| Dota 2 | 107
−40.2%
|
150−160
+40.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 56
−48.2%
|
80−85
+48.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−38.9%
|
100−105
+38.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
−49.3%
|
100−105
+49.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37
−108%
|
75−80
+108%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100
−29.5%
|
120−130
+29.5%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
−39.5%
|
180−190
+39.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 37
−29.7%
|
45−50
+29.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
−47.8%
|
30−35
+47.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
−29.6%
|
35−40
+29.6%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
−23.5%
|
210−220
+23.5%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−40%
|
70−75
+40%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 41
−41.5%
|
55−60
+41.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−50%
|
65−70
+50%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
−55%
|
60−65
+55%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−53.1%
|
45−50
+53.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−57.1%
|
21−24
+57.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−52%
|
35−40
+52%
|
| Valorant | 100−105
−50%
|
150−160
+50%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−50%
|
35−40
+50%
|
| Dota 2 | 109
−37.6%
|
150−160
+37.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−50%
|
30−33
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−45.2%
|
45−50
+45.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−64.7%
|
27−30
+64.7%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20
−55.6%
|
27−30
+55.6%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Counter-Strike 2 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
This is how T1200 Mobile and Radeon 8040S compete in popular games:
- Radeon 8040S is 38% faster in 1080p
- Radeon 8040S is 36% faster in 1440p
- Radeon 8040S is 36% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 8040S is 108% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 8040S performs better in 41 tests (76%)
- there's a draw in 13 tests (24%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.35 | 24.94 |
| Recency | 12 April 2021 | 6 January 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 55 Watt |
T1200 Mobile has 206% lower power consumption.
Radeon 8040S, on the other hand, has a 44% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon 8040S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 8040S is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
