UHD Graphics 750 vs Quadro T1000

Place in performance ranking	299	624
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.56	2.10
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	TU117	Rocket Lake GT1
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$920	$1454

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro T1000 has 308% better value for money than UHD Graphics 750.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	256
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	20.80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T1000 and UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	no data	System Shared
Memory bus width	no data	System Shared
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	System Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	no data	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro T1000 16.99
+279%

UHD Graphics 750 4.48

Quadro T1000 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 279% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro T1000 6569
+279%

UHD Graphics 750 1733

Quadro T1000 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 279% in Passmark.