RTX A1000 vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Max-Q with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.

T1000 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
17.49

RTX A1000 outperforms T1000 Max-Q by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking315201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.1438.89
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962304
Core clock speed765 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate75.60105.3
Floating-point processing power2.419 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5672
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Max-Q 17.49
RTX A1000 28.18
+61.1%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 Max-Q 6724
RTX A1000 10835
+61.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Elden Ring 55−60
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−52.8%
110−120
+52.8%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Valorant 70−75
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Dota 2 60−65
−53.2%
95−100
+53.2%
Elden Ring 55−60
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−55.7%
95−100
+55.7%
Fortnite 95−100
−57.9%
150−160
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−52.8%
110−120
+52.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
−53.2%
95−100
+53.2%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−55.7%
190−200
+55.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−57.4%
85−90
+57.4%
Valorant 70−75
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
World of Tanks 210−220
−40.2%
300−310
+40.2%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Dota 2 60−65
−53.2%
95−100
+53.2%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−55.7%
95−100
+55.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−52.8%
110−120
+52.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−55.7%
190−200
+55.7%
Valorant 70−75
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
Dota 2 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Elden Ring 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−55.3%
250−260
+55.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
World of Tanks 120−130
−58.3%
190−200
+58.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−55.6%
70−75
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−53.8%
60−65
+53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Valorant 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Dota 2 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Elden Ring 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−53.8%
80−85
+53.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Fortnite 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Valorant 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.49 28.18
Recency 27 May 2019 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm

RTX A1000 has a 61.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8
18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7
22 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.