RTX A4500 Mobile vs Quadro RTX A6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX A6000 with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX A6000
2020
48 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
58.61
+30.3%

RTX A6000 outperforms RTX A4500 Mobile by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3878
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.87no data
Power efficiency13.4422.12
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA102GA104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date5 October 2020 (4 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores107525888
Core clock speed1410 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1800 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate604.8276.0
Floating-point processing power38.71 TFLOPS17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs11296
TMUs336184
Tensor Cores336184
Ray Tracing Cores8446

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth768.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A6000 58.61
+30.3%
RTX A4500 Mobile 44.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A6000 22535
+30.3%
RTX A4500 Mobile 17300

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD175
+34.6%
130−140
−34.6%
1440p129
+35.8%
95−100
−35.8%
4K114
+34.1%
85−90
−34.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.57no data
1440p36.04no data
4K40.78no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+37.8%
95−100
−37.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+34.7%
95−100
−34.7%
Elden Ring 210−220
+36%
160−170
−36%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+5.4%
110−120
−5.4%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+37.8%
95−100
−37.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+34.7%
95−100
−34.7%
Forza Horizon 4 300
+32.7%
220−230
−32.7%
Metro Exodus 66
−57.6%
100−110
+57.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+24.4%
85−90
−24.4%
Valorant 260−270
+42.6%
180−190
−42.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+5.4%
110−120
−5.4%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+37.8%
95−100
−37.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+34.7%
95−100
−34.7%
Dota 2 132
−1.5%
130−140
+1.5%
Elden Ring 210−220
+36%
160−170
−36%
Far Cry 5 78
−32.1%
100−110
+32.1%
Fortnite 230−240
+22.9%
180−190
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 4 293
+29.6%
220−230
−29.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 128
−4.7%
130−140
+4.7%
Metro Exodus 78
−33.3%
100−110
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+2.4%
210−220
−2.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+24.4%
85−90
−24.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+6.1%
160−170
−6.1%
Valorant 260−270
+42.6%
180−190
−42.6%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+5.4%
110−120
−5.4%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+37.8%
95−100
−37.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+34.7%
95−100
−34.7%
Dota 2 131
−2.3%
130−140
+2.3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+13.6%
100−110
−13.6%
Forza Horizon 4 288
+27.4%
220−230
−27.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+2.4%
210−220
−2.4%
Valorant 260−270
+42.6%
180−190
−42.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 96
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%
Elden Ring 140−150
+45.4%
95−100
−45.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 96
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+47.8%
45−50
−47.8%
World of Tanks 350−400
+35.1%
280−290
−35.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+10.1%
75−80
−10.1%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+50%
45−50
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+50%
45−50
−50%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+11.1%
140−150
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 247
+83%
130−140
−83%
Metro Exodus 63
−49.2%
90−95
+49.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+45.8%
80−85
−45.8%
Valorant 220−230
+51.3%
150−160
−51.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+41.7%
45−50
−41.7%
Dota 2 155
+68.5%
90−95
−68.5%
Elden Ring 70−75
+53.2%
45−50
−53.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+68.5%
90−95
−68.5%
Metro Exodus 70
+79.5%
35−40
−79.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+38.7%
150−160
−38.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 155
+68.5%
90−95
−68.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+37%
50−55
−37%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+41.7%
45−50
−41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+54.5%
21−24
−54.5%
Dota 2 128
+39.1%
90−95
−39.1%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+50%
70−75
−50%
Fortnite 95−100
+41.2%
65−70
−41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 149
+93.5%
75−80
−93.5%
Valorant 120−130
+56.8%
80−85
−56.8%

This is how RTX A6000 and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is 35% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A6000 is 36% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A6000 is 34% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A6000 is 94% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 58% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is ahead in 54 tests (86%)
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is ahead in 7 tests (11%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 58.61 44.99
Recency 5 October 2020 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 140 Watt

RTX A6000 has a 30.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A4500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 477 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.