Quadro NVS 280 SD vs Quadro RTX A6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking541601
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.88no data
Power efficiency13.96no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGA102NV18 C1
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 October 2020 (5 years ago)31 May 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10752no data
Core clock speed1410 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1800 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate604.81.000
Floating-point processing power38.71 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1122
TMUs3364
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores84no data
L1 Cache10.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount48 GB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth768.0 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)8.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A6000 22797
+1139750%
Samples: 432
NVS 280 SD 2
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD158no data
1440p123no data
4K106no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.42no data
1440p37.80no data
4K43.86no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 280−290 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170 no data
Counter-Strike 2 280−290 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140 no data
Escape from Tarkov 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 52 no data
Fortnite 240−250 no data
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170 no data
Counter-Strike 2 280−290 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140 no data
Dota 2 139 no data
Escape from Tarkov 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 53 no data
Fortnite 240−250 no data
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 128 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140 no data
Metro Exodus 98 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 307 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140 no data
Dota 2 131 no data
Escape from Tarkov 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 52 no data
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 240−250 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 150−160 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 96 no data
Metro Exodus 84 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Escape from Tarkov 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 52 no data
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 155 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Dota 2 128 no data
Escape from Tarkov 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2020 31 May 2005
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 10 Watt

RTX A6000 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 76700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 SD, on the other hand, has 2900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX A6000 and Quadro NVS 280 SD. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Quadro NVS 280 SD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 513 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX A6000 or Quadro NVS 280 SD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.