RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs Quadro RTX 8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
500 Blackwell Mobile 1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 8000 with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 8000
2018
48 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
46.65
+33%

RTX 8000 outperforms RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 8000 RTX 8000
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.90no data
Power efficiency13.9060.40
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameTU102GB206
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46083328
Core clock speed1395 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1657 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8172.3
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS11.03 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs288104
Tensor Cores576104
Ray Tracing Cores7226
L1 Cache4.5 MB3.3 MB
L2 Cache6 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount48 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.512.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD170−180
+30.8%
130
−30.8%
1440p90−95
+30.4%
69
−30.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p58.82no data
1440p111.10no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 88
+0%
88
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RTX 8000 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 8000 is 31% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 8000 is 30% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 46.65 35.08
Recency 13 August 2018 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 8000 has a 33% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 477.8% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
L40S L40S
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
K1000M K1000M
GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
Tesla P4 P4
GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
RX 6400 6400
R7 A260 AMD R7 A260
vs
GMA X4500 X4500
RTX 6000 NVIDIA RTX 6000
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs G7 80EUs
M5000 SE Quadro M5000 SE
vs
Tesla K40t K40t
Pro V7350X2 AMD Pro V7350X2
vs
6100 + nForce 420 6100 + nForce 420
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
Jetson TX2 GPU TX2 GPU
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X 3060 Ti GDDR6X
vs
RX 590 590
R7 M265DX AMD R7 M265DX
vs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 478 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 8000 or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.