Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Quadro RTX 8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Qualcomm Adreno 685

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 8000 with Qualcomm Adreno 680, including specs and performance data.

RTX 8000
2018, $9,999
48 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
47.21
+2137%

RTX 8000 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by a whopping 2137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 8000 RTX 8000
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking78915
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.91no data
Power efficiency14.0723.35
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU102no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)6 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608no data
Core clock speed1395 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8no data
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs288no data
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L1 Cache4.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount48 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 8000 47.21
+2137%
Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 8000 19926
+2136%
Samples: 85
Qualcomm Adreno 680 891
Samples: 168

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 47.21 2.11
Recency 13 August 2018 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 7 Watt

RTX 8000 has a 2137.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm Adreno 680, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 3614.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 680 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
L40S L40S
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 685 Adreno 685
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
Quadro 4100 Quadro 4100
vs
RX 6600 RX 6600
Quadro 4100 Quadro 4100
vs
T400 T400
R9 FURY X2 Radeon R9 FURY X2
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
R9 FURY X2 Radeon R9 FURY X2
vs
RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Max-Q
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
GTX 1650 GTX 1650
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
HD 8400 Mobile IGP HD 8400 Mobile IGP
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU Subor Z+ GPU
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
GT 710 PCIe x1 GT 710 PCIe x1
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RX 6600 XT RX 6600 XT
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
Arc Graphics 130T Graphics 130T

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 479 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 43 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 8000 or Qualcomm Adreno 680, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.