GeForce MX570 vs Quadro RTX 8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 8000 with GeForce MX570, including specs and performance data.

RTX 8000
2018
48 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
44.77
+245%

8000 outperforms MX570 by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 8000 RTX 8000
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.90no data
Power efficiency13.8641.77
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU102GA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)May 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46082048
Core clock speed1395 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate509.873.92
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs9640
TMUs28864
Tensor Cores57664
Ray Tracing Cores7216
L1 Cache4.5 MB2 MB
L2 Cache6 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 8000 44.77
+245%
GeForce MX570 12.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 8000 19798
+245%
Samples: 81
GeForce MX570 5737
Samples: 40

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+242%
38
−242%

Cost per frame, $

1080p76.92no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 54
+0%
54
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how RTX 8000 and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 8000 is 242% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.77 12.97
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 8000 has a 245.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 940% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce MX570 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
L40S L40S
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660
vs
Vega 3 Efficient Vega 3 Efficient
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2080 Ti RTX 2080 Ti
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
TITAN RTX TITAN RTX
RTX 5070 SUPER GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER
vs
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
vs
RTX 8000 RTX 8000
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
vs
R5 Mobile Graphics R5 Mobile Graphics
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
vs
R5 Mobile Graphics R5 Mobile Graphics
RTX 4060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q
vs
R7 M265DX R7 M265DX
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
vs
RX 580 2048SP RX 580 2048SP
RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107
vs
HD 6250 IGP HD 6250 IGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 478 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 110 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 8000 or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.