Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs Quadro RTX 6000
Aggregated performance score
RTX 6000
2018
24 GB GDDR6
48.72
+2398%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
2021
1.95
Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 2398% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 57 | 856 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 10.06 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Gen. 11 (2021) |
| GPU code name | TU102 | Gen. 11 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 August 2018 (5 years old) | 11 January 2021 (3 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | no data |
| Current price | $3083 (0.5x MSRP) | no data |
Value for money
no data
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4608 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 18,600 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 260 Watt | 4.8 - 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 509.8 | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro RTX 6000 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | no data |
| CUDA | 7.5 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 190−200
+2275%
| 8
−2275%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 48.72 | 1.95 |
| Recency | 13 August 2018 | 11 January 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 260 Watt | 4 Watt |
The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
