Radeon RX 7600M vs Quadro RTX 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7600M 7600M XT 7600S 7700S 7800M 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 6000 with Radeon RX 7600M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 6000
2018, $6,299
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
42.57
+62.6%

RTX 6000 outperforms 7600M by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
RX 7600M RX 7600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking99248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.32no data
Power efficiency12.6322.43
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameTU102Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081792
Core clock speed1440 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2410 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8269.9
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS17.27 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs288112
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores7228
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache4.5 MB512 KB
L2 Cache6 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 6000 42.57
+62.6%
RX 7600M 26.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 6000 17886
+62.6%
Samples: 241
RX 7600M 10999
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+52.9%
85
−52.9%
1440p65−70
+51.2%
43
−51.2%
4K35−40
+52.2%
23
−52.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p48.45no data
1440p96.91no data
4K179.97no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 164
+0%
164
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+0%
111
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 138
+0%
138
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 94
+0%
94
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how RTX 6000 and RX 7600M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 53% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 is 51% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 is 52% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 42.57 26.18
Recency 13 August 2018 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 90 Watt

RTX 6000 has a 62.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 188.9% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7600M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
AMD Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Pro W5700X Radeon Pro W5700X
RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M
vs
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Pro W6900X Radeon Pro W6900X
GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
HD 8550D IGP Radeon HD 8550D IGP
vs
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
R9 A375 Radeon R9 A375
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
Quadro 4100 Quadro 4100
vs
RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
Quadro 4100 Quadro 4100
vs
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 142 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 6000 or Radeon RX 7600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.