Radeon 890M vs Quadro RTX 6000

#ad 
Buy Quadro RTX 6000
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-16 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
Radeon 520 Radeon 530 Radeon 540X Radeon 610 Radeon 610M Radeon 660M Radeon 680M Radeon 740M Radeon 760M Radeon 780M Radeon 880M Radeon 890M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 6000 with Radeon 890M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 6000
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
44.00
+119%

RTX 6000 outperforms 890M by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking78270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.12no data
Power efficiency12.64100.00
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameTU102Strix Point
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081024
Core clock speed1440 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8185.6
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs28864
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores7216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 6000 44.00
+119%
Radeon 890M 20.09
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 6000 18543
+119%
Radeon 890M 8468

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+109%
43
−109%
1440p35−40
+94.4%
18
−94.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p69.99no data
1440p179.97no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 117
+0%
117
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 43
+0%
43
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+0%
55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how RTX 6000 and Radeon 890M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 109% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 is 94% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.00 20.09
Recency 13 August 2018 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 6000 has a 119% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 890M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 1633.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 890M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation card while Radeon 890M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
A10G A10G
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
vs
GTX 880M SLI GeForce GTX 880M SLI
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Pro W5700X Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon 620 Radeon 620
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
i740 Graphics i740 Graphics
vs
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Iris Xe Graphics MAX
vs
RX Vega M Radeon RX Vega M
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
vs
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
RX 550 640SP RX 550 640SP
vs
RX 6950 XT RX 6950 XT
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics
vs
Tegra X1 Tegra X1
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
vs
Radeon VII Radeon VII
A800 PCIe 80 GB A800 PCIe 80 GB
vs
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6500 XT
vs
Pro 575X Radeon Pro 575X
HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
vs
P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7
135 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
165 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 6000 or Radeon 890M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.