GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 6000 with GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 6000
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
48.67
+59.8%

RTX 6000 outperforms RTX 2060 Mobile by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking67187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.51no data
Power efficiency12.8718.20
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102TU106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081920
Core clock speed1440 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8144.0
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs288120
Tensor Cores576240
Ray Tracing Cores7230

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+53.8%
104
−53.8%
1440p100−110
+51.5%
66
−51.5%
4K65−70
+54.8%
42
−54.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p39.37no data
1440p62.99no data
4K96.91no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 149
+0%
149
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+0%
100
+0%
Valorant 140
+0%
140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+0%
123
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 61
+0%
61
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 247
+0%
247
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 81
+0%
81
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+0%
21
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 123
+0%
123
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Elden Ring 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
World of Tanks 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 87
+0%
87
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Elden Ring 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 98
+0%
98
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 41
+0%
41
+0%

This is how RTX 6000 and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 54% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 is 52% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 is 55% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.67 30.45
Recency 13 August 2018 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 6000 has a 59.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 126.1% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 133 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1711 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.