GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102TU104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)10 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 $349

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081920
Core clock speed1305 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate449.3201.6
Floating-point processing power14.38 TFLOPS6.451 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs288120
Tensor Cores576240
Ray Tracing Cores7230

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 10 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 160 Watt

RTX 6000 Passive has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2060 TU104, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and GeForce RTX 2060 TU104. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 62 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.