Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking256not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.69no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameTU106Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate175.0144.0
Floating-point processing power5.599 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 28 Watt

Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile has an age advantage of 4 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 50 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 20 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.