XGI Volari 8300 vs Quadro RTX 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.89no data
Power efficiency12.27no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)XG4 (2003−2005)
GPU code nameTU104XG47
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)1 November 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed1620 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million90 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Texture fill rate348.52.400
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1928
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s4.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 1 November 2005
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 130 nm

RTX 5000 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 and XGI Volari 8300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation graphics card while XGI Volari 8300 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
XGI Volari 8300
Volari 8300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 246 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate XGI Volari 8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 or XGI Volari 8300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.