Radeon R5 A220 vs Quadro RTX 5000
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 146 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.89 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.27 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | TU104 | Caicos |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 August 2018 (7 years ago) | 2014 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 160 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 370 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 348.5 | 6.200 |
| Floating-point processing power | 11.15 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 64 | 4 |
| TMUs | 192 | 8 |
| Tensor Cores | 384 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1800 MBps |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 35 Watt |
RTX 5000 has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
R5 A220, on the other hand, has 557.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon R5 A220. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 A220 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
