Radeon R7 350 640SP vs Quadro RTX 5000
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 143 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.11 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.32 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | TU104 | Cape Verde |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 August 2018 (7 years ago) | 7 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 348.5 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 11.15 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 16 |
| TMUs | 192 | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 384 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 August 2018 | 7 January 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 55 Watt |
RTX 5000 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
R7 350 640SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 318.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 640SP is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
