Radeon RX Vega 2 vs Quadro RTX 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking143not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.11no data
Power efficiency12.32no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU104Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)7 January 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072128
Core clock speed1620 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1815 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate348.5no data
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs192no data
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 7 January 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 5000 has an age advantage of 7 months.

RX Vega 2, on the other hand, has 1433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon RX Vega 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 2 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 2
Radeon RX Vega 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 241 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 252 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 or Radeon RX Vega 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.