RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile vs Quadro RTX 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 5000 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive 8100 8200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000
2018, $2,299
16 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
36.59

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms RTX 5000 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 5000 RTX 5000
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking143106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.08no data
Power efficiency12.3333.20
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameTU104GB203
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307210496
Core clock speed1620 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate348.5551.0
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPS35.27 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs192328
Tensor Cores384328
Ray Tracing Cores4882
L1 Cache3 MB10.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.512.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
−14%
171
+14%
1440p100−110
−20%
120
+20%
4K75−80
−16%
87
+16%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.33no data
1440p22.99no data
4K30.65no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+0%
160
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 138
+0%
138
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 168
+0%
168
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 14% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 20% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 16% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 36.59 40.71
Recency 13 August 2018 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 95 Watt

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 142.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
vs
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
vs
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
RTX 5000 NVIDIA RTX 5000
vs
Pro 5500M 5500M
RTX 5000 NVIDIA RTX 5000
vs
STG-2000 2000
RTX 5000 NVIDIA RTX 5000
vs
T400 4 GB 4 GB
RTX 5000 NVIDIA RTX 5000
vs
RX 7800 XT 7800 XT
RTX 5000 NVIDIA RTX 5000
vs
H200 NVL NVL
R5 A220 AMD R5 A220
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB
Pro V7350X2 AMD Pro V7350X2
vs
RX 540X 540X
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1650 TU116 1650 TU116
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX A4500 Embedded A4500 Embedded
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
Graphics Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 241 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.