Apple M1 8-Core GPU vs Quadro RTX 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 with Apple M1 8-Core GPU, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000
2018
16 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
41.37
+194%

RTX 5000 outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking86347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.28no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)no data
GPU code nameTU104no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (5 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data
Current price$1540 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30728
Core clock speed1620 MHz1278 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Texture fill rate348.5no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 5000 and Apple M1 8-Core GPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed14000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA7.5no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+188%
26
−188%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+219%
21−24
−219%
Hitman 3 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+217%
18−20
−217%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+219%
21−24
−219%
Hitman 3 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+217%
18−20
−217%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+219%
21−24
−219%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+217%
18−20
−217%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Hitman 3 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Hitman 3 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%

This is how RTX 5000 and Apple M1 8-Core GPU compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 is 188% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.37 14.08
Recency 13 August 2018 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

The Quadro RTX 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation card while Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 163 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 890 votes

Rate Apple M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.