ATI Radeon 9000 LE vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking182not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.80no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTU104RV250
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed1035 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate296.61.000
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1924
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 28 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has an age advantage of 16 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 LE, on the other hand, has 293% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Radeon 9000 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 9000 LE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 59 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9000 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or Radeon 9000 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.