Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Quadro RTX 8100 Quadro RTX 8200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano Radeon RX Vega XL Radeon RX Vega XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with Radeon RX Vega 64, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
39.58
+7.2%

RTX 4000 outperforms RX Vega 64 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 4000 RTX 4000
RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.4021.80
Power efficiency16.968.58
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU104Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)7 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 4000 has 81% better value for money than RX Vega 64.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044096
Core clock speed1005 MHz1247 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1546 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5395.8
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS12.66 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144256
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm279 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 39.58
+7.2%
RX Vega 64 36.91

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 15212
+7.2%
RX Vega 64 14187

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+0.8%
119
−0.8%
1440p85−90
+3.7%
82
−3.7%
4K55−60
+1.9%
54
−1.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.49
−78.7%
4.19
+78.7%
1440p10.58
−73.8%
6.09
+73.8%
4K16.35
−76.9%
9.24
+76.9%
  • RX Vega 64 has 79% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 has 74% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 has 77% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 161
+0%
161
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+0%
167
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 315
+0%
315
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 146
+0%
146
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 150
+0%
150
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+0%
132
+0%
Valorant 293
+0%
293
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+0%
128
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%
Valorant 140
+0%
140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 263
+0%
263
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how RTX 4000 and RX Vega 64 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 is 1% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 is 4% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 is 2% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.58 36.91
Recency 13 November 2018 7 August 2017
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 295 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 7.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 84.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 4000 and Radeon RX Vega 64.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
Quadro P500 Quadro P500
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 497 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 741 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or Radeon RX Vega 64, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.