AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6
39.79

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 by 87% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9913
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money27.4922.19
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 3
GPU code nameTU104Navi 31 XT
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2018 (5 years old)3 November 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $899
Current price$974 (1.1x MSRP)$884 (1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4000 has 24% better value for money than RX 7900 XT.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23045376
Core clock speed1005 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1545 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt315 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5804.4

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm276 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed13000 MHz20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 39.79
RX 7900 XT 74.41
+87%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 by 87% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 15412
RX 7900 XT 28822
+87%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 by 87% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

RTX 4000 85525
RX 7900 XT 186508
+118%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 by 118% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
−92.7%
212
+92.7%
1440p75−80
−93.3%
145
+93.3%
4K45−50
−107%
93
+107%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 39.79 74.41
Recency 13 November 2018 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 315 Watt

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 425 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1322 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.