Radeon RX 7600S vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with Radeon RX 7600S, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
38.36
+1.3%

RTX 4000 outperforms RX 7600S by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking113121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.24no data
Power efficiency17.0735.94
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameTU104Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041792
Core clock speed1005 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5246.4
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS15.77 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144112
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores3628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 38.36
+1.3%
RX 7600S 37.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 15231
+1.3%
RX 7600S 15032

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
−2.1%
97
+2.1%
1440p40−45
−10%
44
+10%
4K24−27
−4.2%
25
+4.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.46no data
1440p22.48no data
4K37.46no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 228
+0%
228
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 209
+0%
209
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+0%
42
+0%
Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190
+0%
190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 126
+0%
126
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 56
+0%
56
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35
+0%
35
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 163
+0%
163
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 179
+0%
179
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
World of Tanks 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how RTX 4000 and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600S is 2% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600S is 10% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600S is 4% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.36 37.86
Recency 13 November 2018 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 7600S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 113.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 4000 and Radeon RX 7600S.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7600S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Radeon RX 7600S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 494 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 229 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or Radeon RX 7600S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.