Radeon R9 380 vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with Radeon R9 380, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
39.86
+151%

RTX 4000 outperforms R9 380 by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking97315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.799.08
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameTU104Tonga Pro
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date13 November 2018 (5 years ago)26 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $199
Current price$974 (1.1x MSRP)$12.90 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4000 has 217% better value for money than R9 380.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041792
Compute unitsno data28
Core clock speed1005 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1545 MHz970 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5108.6
Floating-point performanceno data3,476 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm221 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length / dual slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFireno data1

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data-
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed13000 MHz970 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s182.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinityno data+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMIno data+
DisplayPort supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data-
CrossFireno data1
Endurono data-
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1
HD3Dno data+
LiquidVRno data1
PowerTuneno data+
TrueAudiono data+
ZeroCoreno data+
VCEno data+
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.56.3
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.131+
Mantleno data+
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 39.86
+151%
R9 380 15.91

Quadro RTX 4000 outperforms Radeon R9 380 by 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 15395
+150%
R9 380 6146

Quadro RTX 4000 outperforms Radeon R9 380 by 150% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+138%
63
−138%
4K60−65
+150%
24
−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+178%
27−30
−178%
Hitman 3 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+178%
27−30
−178%
Hitman 3 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+183%
18−20
−183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+178%
27−30
−178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+200%
10−11
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Hitman 3 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+171%
7−8
−171%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

This is how RTX 4000 and R9 380 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 is 138% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.86 15.91
Recency 13 November 2018 26 June 2015
Cost $899 $199
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 190 Watt

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 460 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 765 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.