Radeon R6 M340DX vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 5000 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive 8100 8200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M230 R5 M240 R5 M320 R5 M420 R5 M435 R6 M255DX R6 M335DX R6 M340DX R6 M435DX R7 M260DX R8 M350DX R8 M435DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with Radeon R6 M340DX, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018, $899
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
35.59
+1238%

RTX 4000 outperforms R6 M340DX by a whopping 1238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
R6 M340DX R6 M340DX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking158855
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.36no data
Power efficiency17.10no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTU104Jet
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2018 (7 years ago)12 December 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304384
Core clock speed1005 MHz955 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Wattno data
Texture fill rate222.524.72
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS0.791 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs14424
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data
L1 Cache2.3 MB96 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1625 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+1200%
10
−1200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.92no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+0%
6
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
+0%
3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how RTX 4000 and R6 M340DX compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 is 1200% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 35.59 2.66
Recency 13 November 2018 12 December 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

RTX 4000 has a 1238% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 M340DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R6 M340DX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
Radeon R6 M340DX
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
R6 M340DX Radeon R6 M340DX
vs
GeForce 840M GeForce 840M
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Arc 140V Mobile Arc 140V Mobile
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
H100 NVL 94 GB H100 NVL 94 GB
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
GTX 980M SLI GeForce GTX 980M SLI
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
R8 M365DX Radeon R8 M365DX
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
R6 M255DX Radeon R6 M255DX
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
R9 Nano Radeon R9 Nano
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
GTX 780M SLI GeForce GTX 780M SLI
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Mobility Radeon HD 5870

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 528 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 37 votes

Rate Radeon R6 M340DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or Radeon R6 M340DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.