GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
30.98
+41.3%

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms 1060 5 GB by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking200288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.6314.04
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU104GP106
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)26 December 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601280
Core clock speed1110 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1709 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6136.7
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs6440
TMUs16080
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache2.5 MB480 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB5 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s160.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.56.1
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+42.7%
75−80
−42.7%
1440p63
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
4K47
+56.7%
30−35
−56.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+47.5%
120−130
−47.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+42%
50−55
−42%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 101
+44.3%
70−75
−44.3%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+47.5%
120−130
−47.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+42%
50−55
−42%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+49.3%
75−80
−49.3%
Far Cry 5 106
+41.3%
75−80
−41.3%
Fortnite 140−150
+43%
100−105
−43%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+43.5%
85−90
−43.5%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+48.2%
85−90
−48.2%
Valorant 190−200
+51.5%
130−140
−51.5%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 87
+45%
60−65
−45%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+47.5%
120−130
−47.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+45.3%
190−200
−45.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+42%
50−55
−42%
Dota 2 132
+46.7%
90−95
−46.7%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+49.3%
75−80
−49.3%
Far Cry 5 100
+42.9%
70−75
−42.9%
Fortnite 140−150
+43%
100−105
−43%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+43.5%
85−90
−43.5%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+46.7%
75−80
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+48.2%
85−90
−48.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+43%
100−105
−43%
Valorant 190−200
+51.5%
130−140
−51.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 81
+47.3%
55−60
−47.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+42%
50−55
−42%
Dota 2 127
+49.4%
85−90
−49.4%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+49.3%
75−80
−49.3%
Far Cry 5 96
+47.7%
65−70
−47.7%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+43.5%
85−90
−43.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+48.2%
85−90
−48.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+50%
50−55
−50%
Valorant 190−200
+51.5%
130−140
−51.5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+43%
100−105
−43%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+46%
50−55
−46%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+46.7%
150−160
−46.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+55%
40−45
−55%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+45.8%
120−130
−45.8%
Valorant 230−240
+45%
160−170
−45%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 66
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+48%
50−55
−48%
Far Cry 5 69
+53.3%
45−50
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Valorant 190−200
+46.2%
130−140
−46.2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Dota 2 106
+41.3%
75−80
−41.3%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Far Cry 5 36
+50%
24−27
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and GTX 1060 5 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 43% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 58% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 57% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.98 21.93
Recency 27 May 2019 26 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has a 41.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 9.1% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 46 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 715 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile or GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.