GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro Plex 7000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated266
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data39.36
Power efficiencyno data18.97
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF110TU117
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,999 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512896
Core clock speed574 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate36.7493.24
Floating-point processing power1.176 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs6456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length522 mm229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DVI, 2x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.07.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 75 Watt

Plex 7000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 7000 and GeForce GTX 1650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro Plex 7000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
Quadro Plex 7000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 21 vote

Rate Quadro Plex 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 23397 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.