UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Quadro Plex 2200 S4

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated714
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.69
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGT200BTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240 ×448
Core clock speed648 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate51.84 ×4no data
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS ×4no data
ROPs32 ×4no data
TMUs80 ×4no data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length522 mmno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×4no data
Memory bus width512 Bit ×4no data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s ×4no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 28 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has an age advantage of 12 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 2042.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 2200 S4 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro Plex 2200 S4 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 541 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 2200 S4 or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.