Quadro Plex 2200 S4 vs ATI FireGL V7350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameR520GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240 ×4
Core clock speed600 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistors321 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)111 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60051.84 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs1632 ×4
TMUs1680 ×4
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm522 mm
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed650 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 111 Watt 600 Watt

ATI FireGL V7350 has 440.5% lower power consumption.

Plex 2200 S4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7350 and Quadro Plex 2200 S4. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V7350
FireGL V7350
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7350 or Quadro Plex 2200 S4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.