RTX A4000 vs Quadro Plex 2200 S4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated87
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.41
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGT200BGA104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240 ×46144
Core clock speed648 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate51.84 ×4299.5
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS ×419.17 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×496
TMUs80 ×4192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length522 mm241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×416 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×4256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s ×4448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.38.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 140 Watt

RTX A4000 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 2200 S4 and RTX A4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4
NVIDIA RTX A4000
RTX A4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 704 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 2200 S4 or RTX A4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.