Quadro FX 4000 vs Quadro Plex 2200 S4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.13
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGT200BNV40
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)1 April 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240 ×4no data
Core clock speed648 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt142 Watt
Texture fill rate51.84 ×44.500
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS ×4no data
ROPs32 ×48
TMUs80 ×412
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length522 mmno data
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×4256 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×4256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s ×432 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 1 April 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 142 Watt

Plex 2200 S4 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 4000, on the other hand, has 322.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 2200 S4 and Quadro FX 4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
Quadro FX 4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 22 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 2200 S4 or Quadro FX 4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.