Arc A530M vs Quadro Plex 2200 S4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.58
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGT200BDG2-256
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)1 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240 ×41536
Core clock speed648 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate51.84 ×4124.8
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS ×43.994 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×448
TMUs80 ×496
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L2 Cache256 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length522 mmno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×48 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×4128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s ×4224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 65 Watt

Arc A530M has an age advantage of 15 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 816.7% more advanced lithography process, and 823.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 2200 S4 and Arc A530M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro Plex 2200 S4 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A530M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 223 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 2200 S4 or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.