Radeon RX Vega 3 vs Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated845
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Power efficiencyno data14.06
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG80Picasso
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)6 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128 ×2192
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1001 MHz
Number of transistors681 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40 ×212.01
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS ×20.3844 TFLOPS
ROPs24 ×24
TMUs32 ×212
L2 Cache96 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length522 mmno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 2033.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2232 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV or Radeon RX Vega 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.