Radeon RX Vega 3 vs Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated772
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Power efficiencyno data13.76
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG80Picasso
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 March 2007 (17 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128192
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1001 MHz
Number of transistors681 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4012.01
Floating-point processing power0.3686 TFLOPS0.3844 TFLOPS
ROPs244
TMUs3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length312 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 March 2007 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1040% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 3 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1951 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.