Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Quadro P620

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking467not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.28no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP107Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512320
Core clock speed1177 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate46.1828.00
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS0.896 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P620 and Radeon Graphics 320SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 320SP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 607 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.